Brian Patrick Kern, whom I featured in July 2019 during the neoliberal “color revolution” regime-change operation in Hong Kong, is back to direct more terrorism against the Chinese gov’t & people. He now uses a fake Chinese name, Kong Tsung-gan, as cover for the propaganda he writes. He was seen once again on the streets of Hong Kong on Sun., May 24th, trying to provoke police to shoot him.
Aunt BB (YouTube)
I thought that the following comment was interesting, except for the last two sentences! Johnson did lockdown Britain!
Martin Ramirez: So Brian is a creep in addition to his encouragement of terror against civilians and police officers? The plot continues to thicken.
I hope some of this information makes it into the brains of the “democratic socialists” and anarchists who get suckered into regime change operations with rhetoric that appeals to them. Here is an essay from the probably faux-socialist Logos Journal with the spectacularly bad take of comparing Xi Jinping to Jair Bolsonaro and Donald Trump: http://logosjournal.com/2020/rolling-back-the-global-advance-of-the-far-right
Bolsonaro let the Amazon burn, and Xi undertook initiatives of reforestation in China, so they’re both the same, right? /sarcasm
There is this huge problem of demsocs, Trotskyists and anarchists who project their own experience and biases in developed countries onto the majority of the world, even if they refuse to admit it. For example, if they’ve lived with relative stability all their lives, they have no idea of what happens in Somalia or the Philippines (where violence from drug cartels, in addition to ISIS popping up in Mindanao, helped inspire the election of Rodrigo Duterte). Virtually every existing regime comes up short compared to the ideal societies in their imagination, and they refuse to discriminate in terms of the differences between governments, and their economic and foreign policies. Coupled with their lack of interest in actually understanding the nuances of real-life political leadership in nations with widely varying histories (the WSWS labeled Fidel Castro a “bourgeois nationalist”), that means they become sitting ducks for propaganda targeting the rivals of the current superpowers, or members of the Non-Aligned Movement, for the sowing of instability in their territories. The “anarcho-morons” as Aunt BB calls them, always claim to be against every state, yet they inevitably gang up more against the weaker ones than against Washington, London, Berlin, etc. And then they smear opposition to the hybrid warfare as “tankie”, “authoritarian”, “totalitarian”, etc. But what exactly did the destruction of Yugoslavia or Libya accomplish in terms of human rights? Except for organised crime and the One Percent of the Balkans, those citizens’ lives are imeasurably worse now (why do you think Libyans now flee to Canada or the EU?). This always happens. So publishing denunciations of capitalism or war is effectively just virtue signaling without an analysis of geopolitical dynamics, and accepting the existence of very dark black operations as an aid in achieving the ruling class’ objectives. In addition to the prominence of psycho or sociopathic personality types in the business, financial, military, and espionage worlds. In this regard, Carl Oglesby, Webster Tarpley pre-2013, independent-minded European liberals and social democrats during the Cold War (e.g. Olof Palme), Philip Giraldi, Jean Bricmont or even David Icke and the Larouchies, demonstrate a better understanding of international intrigue and the financial industry than many professed communists or socialists.
The ultralefts are angry at the adoption in China of markets and doing business with the capitalist world, although Josef Stalin initially supported Lenin’s New Economic Policy (with SMEs and cooperatives) to help develop the productive forces in the new Soviet Union, until the Kulaks began opportunistically hoarding agricultural produce. They may be revisionist, but they still enjoy more public services and infrastructure, with state-controlled strategic industries, than “free-market” America and similar conomies, with an increase in the level of development that most of humanity can only dream of.
In addition the hostile attitude towards the PRC across the media and political spectrum, you have almost all of the punditocracy stupidly acquiescing to the coronavirus lockdown. Even regurgitating nonsense like “Johnson and the others mismanaged the pandemic”! What a shame.
Ms. Cat’s Chronicles 