[Armchair Analysis] Clausewitz, Mao, and the Long War in Venezuela

Clausewitzian Friction. Maoist Endurance. American Overestimation. Wagner’s Ghost Logistics.

This perspective is particularly relevant when examining the complexities of warfare in Venezuela, where the intersection of political ideology and military strategy plays a critical role in shaping conflict dynamics.

A war with Venezuela would likely be protracted due to Clausewitzian friction, Maoist revolutionary strategy, and regional ideological support networks. These factors compound uncertainty, delay decisive outcomes, and favor asymmetric endurance over conventional speed.

The Fog Is Self-Made: Clausewitzian Blindness

• Strategic arrogance: The U.S. might assume rapid dominance based on superior firepower, intelligence, and logistics. But Clausewitz warns that war is not a linear extension of policy—it’s a chaotic realm where plans unravel.

• Operational misreads: American forces could misinterpret local resistance, underestimate terrain friction, and over-rely on tech-driven surveillance. The fog thickens when assumptions replace ground truth.

• Political miscalculation: Expecting a swift regime collapse ignores Venezuela’s ideological depth, regional ties, and capacity for asymmetric endurance. Clausewitz’s friction multiplies when political goals outpace military feasibility.

• Cultural blindness: The U.S. may misread Venezuelan nationalism, revolutionary memory, and Latin American solidarity. Fog isn’t just tactical—it’s epistemic, rooted in misrecognition.

This isn’t just about Venezuela being clever—it’s about the U.S. projecting clarity where none exists. The fog is self-made, thickened by hubris and misalignment between ends and means.

Friction Multiplies: Terrain, Chaos, and the Illusion of Control

From Bangkit Widodo’s analysis:

• Friction refers to the unpredictable obstacles—logistical failures, morale breakdowns, terrain challenges, and human error—that disrupt even well-planned operations. In Venezuela’s case, mountainous terrain, jungle zones, and urban density would amplify these frictions.

• Fog of war denotes the uncertainty in decision-making due to incomplete or distorted information. Venezuela’s use of deception, propaganda, and asymmetric tactics would thicken this fog, especially in urban and border zones.

• Clausewitz emphasized that war is a realm of chance and probability, not linear control. Even technologically superior forces face setbacks when friction and fog compound unpredictability.

Historical parallels—Vietnam, Afghanistan, Ukraine—show that misjudging local resistance and terrain complexity leads to prolonged conflict, regardless of initial superiority.

Three Stages of Refusal: Maoist Endurance and Ideological Depth

From Widodo’s breakdown of Mao’s three-stage model:

• Stage One: Organization and Mobilization—Venezuela has deep ideological roots, with Chavista networks and leftist solidarity across Latin America. Mobilization through political education and social programs builds a resilient base.

• Stage Two: Guerrilla Warfare—Venezuelan forces could exploit geography for hit-and-run tactics, targeting supply lines and communication hubs. Time becomes their weapon, eroding adversary morale and legitimacy.

• Stage Three: Conventional Warfare—If external pressure falters or domestic support grows, Venezuela could transition to more formal military confrontation, backed by popular legitimacy and regional allies.

Groups like ELN in Colombia, remnants of FARC, and sympathetic governments or movements in Bolivia, Nicaragua, and Cuba could offer logistical, ideological, or covert support, extending the conflict beyond Venezuela’s borders.

Scaffolding the Long War: Latin America’s Revolutionary Memory

• Latin America’s history of leftist insurgency—from Sandinistas to Shining Path—provides a template for asymmetric resistance.

• Diaspora and solidarity networks could amplify Venezuela’s narrative, complicating diplomatic isolation and enabling covert support.

• Hybrid warfare—cyber, information, and economic disruption—would likely accompany kinetic conflict, further delaying resolution.

Ghost Manifest: Wagner’s Return to the Hemisphere

• A Russian Ilyushin Il-76 transport aircraft, registration RA-78765, landed in Caracas on October 26, 2025, after a multi-stop journey through Armenia, Algeria, Morocco, Senegal, and Mauritania.

• The aircraft is associated with Aviacon Zitotrans, a sanctioned company tied to the Russian military and formerly used by the Wagner Group for transporting weapons and personnel.

• Analysts suggest the plane may have delivered up to 34 tons of military material, possibly including portable air-defense systems and air-to-air missiles.

Proxy Routes and Power Projection: Strategic Implications

• The circuitous flight path—avoiding Western airspace—mirrors Wagner’s known logistics routes in Africa and the Middle East, designed to evade inspection.

• The landing coincides with Venezuela’s appeal to Russia, China, and Iran for military assistance, following increased U.S. naval deployments in the Caribbean.

• This move may signal Russia’s intent to deepen its footprint in Latin America, using Wagner’s infrastructure as a proxy or logistical backbone.

The Fog Thickens: Clausewitz, Mao, and the Transnational Echo

• Clausewitzian friction intensifies when foreign actors complicate logistics, alliances, and battlefield dynamics.

• Maoist revolutionary warfare gains depth when external support bolsters asymmetric endurance.

• American overestimation becomes more dangerous when adversaries quietly build transnational scaffolding—Wagner’s presence is a ghost in the fog.

Conclusion: Navigating the Fog of War in Venezuela

The prospect of a prolonged conflict in Venezuela underscores the relevance of military theorists like Clausewitz and Mao. Their insights reveal that modern warfare is not merely a test of firepower but a complex interplay of political, cultural, and operational dynamics. As this analysis demonstrates, the United States risks underestimating the challenges posed by Clausewitzian friction and Maoist endurance, both of which could lead to a drawn-out confrontation with significant regional implications.

1. The Challenge of Miscalculation:

   – The U.S. must confront its strategic arrogance and avoid the pitfalls of assuming rapid dominance. Historical precedents remind us that initial military advantages can quickly erode in the face of local resistance and environmental challenges. Overconfidence can lead to severe operational misreads and disastrous political miscalculations.

2. Understanding Asymmetric Endurance:

   – The resilience of Venezuelan forces, rooted in ideological conviction and regional solidarity, complicates any military engagement. By adopting Mao’s three-stage model, it becomes clear that Venezuelan resistance could evolve into a protracted struggle, exploiting geographic advantages and regional networks to sustain their fight against superior forces.

3. The Role of External Actors:

   – The involvement of external powers, particularly through entities like the Wagner Group, introduces additional layers of complexity. Their logistical capabilities and transnational connections could bolster Venezuela’s endurance, complicating U.S. military objectives and strategic planning. This highlights a critical need for the U.S. to reassess its approach to diplomacy and military engagement in Latin America.

4. Strategic Recommendations:

   – To navigate this landscape effectively, U.S. policymakers should prioritize a nuanced understanding of Venezuelan dynamics, engage in robust intelligence gathering, and consider the broader geopolitical context. Developing a strategy that incorporates diplomatic efforts alongside military readiness will be essential to mitigate risks and avoid the traps of overestimation.

5. A Call for a Comprehensive Approach:

   – Ultimately, the U.S. must recognize that war is not a simple extension of policy but a chaotic environment where clarity is often obscured by the fog of war. A comprehensive approach that balances military preparedness with diplomatic engagement and regional collaboration is crucial for addressing the complexities of the Venezuelan conflict. By doing so, the U.S. can better position itself to respond to evolving challenges while minimizing the costs of prolonged engagement.

Sources:

Bangkit Widodo: CLAUSEWITZ’S FRICTION AND FOG OF WAR

Bangkit Widodo: THE THREE STAGES OF MAO ZEDONG’S REVOLUTIONARY WARFARE

Heavy Russian cargo plane lands in Caracas amid US-Venezuela tensions

Russian Military Plane Linked to Wagner Group Lands in Venezuela

Cargo Plane Tied to Russian Military Arrives in Venezuela As U.S. Further Expands Its Presence in The Region

Russian Il-76 Formerly Used by Wagner PMC Lands in Venezuela

Russian cargo plane linked to Wagner Group lands in Venezuela