Russia, Ukraine, and The New York Times
Recommended YouTube video:
Why is Ukraine the West’s Fault? Featuring John Mearsheimer
This article pretty much summarizes it, although Crimea voted to rejoin Russia.
Russia, Ukraine, and The New York Times
Recommended YouTube video:
Why is Ukraine the West’s Fault? Featuring John Mearsheimer
This article pretty much summarizes it, although Crimea voted to rejoin Russia.
It is possible to actually measure Washington’s dishonesty. How big is it? It’s about 600 miles.
Putin sets a new red line on NATO expansion
Black Box East: The role of “the East” in the West’s radical imagination
Now, the third itinerary is one of romanticism. When the cultural revolution took place in China, European Marxists who felt that the Soviet Union was too boring or gray began to fantasize. You get all these books exaggerating what’s happening in China based on a very little understanding. There is a story from the late 1960s that Ho Chi Minh met an Italian Communist Party delegation. They’re sitting in his secret house, a very modest place; he’s sitting there, characteristically, with a cigarette in his hand and the Italians ask him how they can help Vietnam, a very honest and sincere question as there are American planes above bombing the crap out of Vietnam. But Ho Chi Minh doesn’t say: send us this or that; he says “go home and make a revolution.” He’s saying: sure, we need solidarity, we need tons of it, but we don’t need romanticism. We are making our revolution. We are going to die and sacrifice and yes, we need you out there fighting against the lies that they tell about us. But go home make your revolution. What’s the point of fantasizing about Cuba? Cuba of course needs solidarity today more than ever. Venezuela needs solidarity today more than ever. But go home and make your revolution.
America’s Most Important Right-Wing Conference of the Year Is An Israeli Influence Operation
Sounds like something Steve Bannon would approve of!
NATO, along with the Europeans and Americans are playing a crucial role in driving Canadian political thought. While some elements of the Canadian left understand the influence which foreign foundations and semi-NGOs play in Canadian politics, very few hard examples have been provided to back up this inherent understanding. The paranoia being spread by Canada’s political elites, think tanks and national security friendly public figures about “Russian and Chinese infiltration” and “elite capture” appears as projection, designed to deflect from the overwhelming sources of foreign financing in Canada’s civic sphere. The funders only involve themselves in Canadian civil society because there is something to be gained from it. They are responsible for part of the intellectual bedrock that upholds Canadian militarism and interventionism.
You must be logged in to post a comment.