Fired CISA chief Krebs to testify before the Senate panel
Related:
Senator Ron Johnson No Longer Has Constituents; He Has a Boss, a Don
Racine judge affirms election results, striking blow to Trump’s efforts to overturn election results
All of the Trump campaign’s challenges attack long-standing Wisconsin election practices that were in effect — and unchallenged — when Trump won the state in 2016.
“In a democracy the citizen must demand genuine policy choices and a right to shape that policy. Voting for corporate figureheads is not democracy”
My take on the US elections – interview to the Swiss-German journal “Zeitgeschehen im Fokus”
Legal experts quickly push back on Texas AG’s attempt to overturn election
Under federal law, election disputes are supposed to be resolved by six days before the Electoral College meets, a deadline known as safe harbor, which is today. The electors officially cast their ballots for president on Monday.
Related:
With case pending in state court, Wisconsin is only state to miss election safe-harbor deadline
Paxton, who is under a federal bribery investigation, alleges Wisconsin “exploited” the coronavirus pandemic to ignore election rules, which affected the outcome of the Nov. 3 election.
“Think of the irony. We have a Texas Attorney General who is being investigated by the FBI for various improprieties … and he teams up with President Trump to try to take away the votes of the people of Wisconsin,” Gov. Tony Evers told reporters on Tuesday. “It’s irony but it’s not funny irony. It’s extraordinarily sad.”
Trump’s Legal Losses Come Fast And Furious
“Judicial acquiescence to such entreaties built on so flimsy a foundation would do indelible damage to every future election,” he wrote. “Once the door is opened to judicial invalidation of presidential election results, it will be awfully hard to close that door again. This is a dangerous path we are being asked to tread. The loss of public trust in our constitutional order resulting from the exercise of this kind of judicial power would be incalculable.
Exactly!
Related:
Can this circus show get anymore ridiculous?!
Pennsylvania Supreme Court strikes down GOP bid to stop election certification
The latest order by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reverses McCullough’s decision.
Related:
Judge Questions Pennsylvania Mail-In Vote Law Enacted in 2019
Judge Questions Pennsylvania Mail-In Vote Law Enacted in 2019
The case is unrelated to one brought by President Donald Trump’s campaign, rejected by a federal appeals court on Friday, that sought to undo Pennsylvania’s certification of President-elect Joe Biden’s victory in the Keystone State.
McCullough’s opinion, posted Friday night, doesn’t add anything to the GOP-brought case as a practical matter, but provides the judge’s reasoning for having ordered a temporary delay.
…
McCullough, a Republican, said the GOP was likely to succeed in establishing that the procedure by which Pennsylvania’s GOP-controlled legislature instituted new mail-in voting methods as part of the 2019 Act 77 violated the state’s constitution. The judge didn’t say whether she thinks that means that any votes cast by mail-in ballot must be disqualified.
You must be logged in to post a comment.