by Jim Bovard | Jun 28, 2022
In 2015, Justice Department press chief Brian Fallon bitterly complained to USA Today editors about my articles walloping Attorney General Eric Holder, including”Eric Holder’s Lawless Legacy,” [Feb. 3, 2015] and “Eric Holder’s Police Shooting Record? Dismal,” [Aug. 20, 2014]. Fallon (who later became presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s press secretary) protested to USA Today commentary editor David Mastio and another USA Today editor, Brian Gallagher, about my “consistently nasty words about Mr. Holder” and said that Bovard “has never had a kind thing to say about Holder.” (Actually, I praised Holder’s curtailing prosecutions of minor drug possession in a 2013 USA Today column that recounted my experiences working with a convict road gang.)
The Justice Department Pressured USA Today to Stop Publishing Me
Tag: FISA
Shouldn’t Hillary Clinton Be Banned From Twitter Now?
Trial testimony reveals Hillary Clinton personally approved serious election misinformation. Is there an anti-Trump exception to content moderation?
Shouldn’t Hillary Clinton Be Banned From Twitter Now?
FBI Conducted Potentially Millions of Searches of Americans’ Data Last Year, Report Says
[2018] The Biggest Secret
By James Risen
My Life as a New York Times Reporter in the Shadow of the War on Terror
The Biggest Secret
Related:
Was Jeffrey Sterling Trial a Gov’t Effort to Divide Investigative Journalists & Whistleblowers?
We Need Answers About the CIA’s Mass Surveillance
The Central Intelligence Agency has been collecting American’s private data without any oversight or even the minimal legal safeguards that apply to the NSA and FBI, an unconstitutional affront to our civil liberties.
We Need Answers About the CIA’s Mass Surveillance
H/T: Aletho News
The CIA has been conducting mass surveillance in the U.S. with minimal oversight—and the program’s uncovering is bad news for Big Tech
Operation Whistle Pig: Inside the secret CBP unit with no rules that investigates Americans
Operation Whistle Pig: Inside the secret CBP unit with no rules that investigates Americans
More information:
Federal anti-terror unit investigated journalists
Related:
About That Yahoo Article on Ali Watkins and James Wolfe
New York Times reassigns reporter Ali Watkins, reporter in leak investigation
This story just seems suspect. Watkins pushed Russiagate and had questionable ethics, but what do I know?! 🤷🏼♀️
[Letter from Washington] The Enemies Briefcase – Secret powers and the presidency
A few hours before the inauguration ceremony, the prospective president receives an elaborate and highly classified briefing on the means and procedures for blowing up the world with a nuclear attack, a rite of passage that a former official described as “a sobering moment.” Secret though it may be, we are at least aware that this introduction to apocalypse takes place. At some point in the first term, however, experts surmise that an even more secret briefing occurs, one that has never been publicly acknowledged. In it, the new president learns how to blow up the Constitution.
The session introduces “presidential emergency action documents,” or PEADs, orders that authorize a broad range of mortal assaults on our civil liberties. In the words of a rare declassified official description, the documents outline how to “implement extraordinary presidential authority in response to extraordinary situations”—by imposing martial law, suspending habeas corpus, seizing control of the internet, imposing censorship, and incarcerating so-called subversives, among other repressive measures. “We know about the nuclear briefcase that carries the launch codes,” Joel McCleary, a White House official in the Carter Administration, told me. “But over at the Office of Legal Counsel at the Justice Department there’s a list of all the so-called enemies of the state who would be rounded up in an emergency. I’ve heard it called the ‘enemies briefcase.’ ”
The Enemies Briefcase – Secret powers and the presidency
Related:
Mitch McConnell Wants to Crank Up Bill Barr’s Surveillance Powers. What Could Go Wrong?
Mitch McConnell Wants to Crank Up Bill Barr’s Surveillance Powers. What Could Go Wrong?
Ackerman correctly points out that these amendments would pretty much guarantee the ability of an incumbent administration to spy on its political opponents without consequence. In addition, the second amendment would allow an attorney general to meddle in the FISA process to an extent even beyond the way he can now.
Mitch McConnell Wants to Crank Up Bill Barr’s Surveillance Powers. What Could Go Wrong?
Mitch McConnell Wants to Crank Up Bill Barr’s Surveillance Powers. What Could Go Wrong?
Ackerman correctly points out that these amendments would pretty much guarantee the ability of an incumbent administration to spy on its political opponents without consequence. In addition, the second amendment would allow an attorney general to meddle in the FISA process to an extent even beyond the way he can now.
You must be logged in to post a comment.