$9.8M lawsuit targets convoy leaders after GoFundMe cuts off 10M fund; Tamara Lich quits Maverick Party board & Some Interesting Theories (Updated)

$9.8M lawsuit targets convoy leaders after GoFundMe cuts off 10M fund; Tamara Lich quits Maverick Party board

More & Some Interesting Theories:

‘Significant element’ from U.S. involved in self-described ‘Freedom Convoy’ in Canada, official says

Canada’s ‘freedom convoy’ exposes political missteps — and Donald Trump’s ominous legacy

Canada Must Investigate the Convoy Money

Startling Trump interference points to GoFundMe convoy campaign manipulation

Update:

Protest organizer: No intent to topple government … and no plan to leave until COVID mandates lifted

Twitter confirms its ‘Project Guardian’ keeps an eye on today’s main character

Twitter confirms its ‘Project Guardian’ keeps an eye on today’s main character

According to Bloomberg, some users enrolled in Project Guardian in the past include makeup artist James Charles, Egyptian activist Wael Ghonim [Regime Change Asset*], as well as former US Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb [Pfizer Director]. Twitter has also used the program to protect journalists who cover controversial topics, like the January riots or 8chan.

More information:

*Egypt’s Wael Ghonim of Google

*US Government Role in Arab Spring

*Hillary Sponsored Arab Spring To Destabilise Middle East

H/T: Aletho News

Anti Mandate Protesting: It’s on!

Today I went by a protest on public property in front of Brock University. It was not at the main entrance as our lying media claimed. It was on the public sidewalk well away from the “main entrance”

Anti Mandate Protesting: It’s on!

Related:

The United Nations tribunal in Arusha has convicted three former media executives of being key figures in the media campaign to incite ethnic Hutus to kill Tutsis in Rwanda in 1994.

The impact of hate media in Rwanda

🤔💭

Canada: Fast-moving proposal creates filtering, blocking and reporting rules – and speech police to enforce them

BY CORYNNE MCSHERRY AND KATITZA RODRIGUEZ | EFF | AUGUST 10, 2021

Policymakers around the world are contemplating a wide variety of proposals to address “harmful” online expression. Many of these proposals are dangerously misguided and will inevitably result in the censorship of all kinds of lawful and valuable expression. And one of the most dangerous proposals may be adopted in Canada. How bad is it? As Stanford’s Daphne Keller observes, “It’s like a list of the worst ideas around the world.” She’s right.

Canada: Fast-moving proposal creates filtering, blocking and reporting rules – and speech police to enforce them