Tag: NDAA
Lithuania wants to be the new Eastern outpost for US empire
Like their ancient Roman counterparts, U.S. legions supplement regional security, and so the footprint grows.
Lithuania wants to be the new Eastern outpost for US empire
Biden: Treat Troops Who Refuse Vax the Same as Deserters, Spies, Murderers
The U.S. Army’s Iron Dome could be headed to Ukraine
A House bill wants more money for Kyiv’s defense, and a missile-defense system might be in the mix.
The U.S. Army’s Iron Dome could be headed to Ukraine
Lawmakers pave way for $1.2 trillion in new military spending over next 10 years
By Andrew Lautz | Responsible Statecraft | September 2, 2021
Reporters, lobbyists, activists, Biden administration officials and, of course, lawmakers and their staffs spent countless hours and an ocean of ink on the negotiations for and passage of a recent bipartisan infrastructure bill totaling around $1 trillion. Casual observers probably won’t hear as much, though, about two votes — one in the Senate and one in the House — that could pave the way for Congress to spend a whopping $1.2 trillion additional dollars on the military, above current projections, over the next decades. Here’s how.
Lawmakers pave way for $1.2 trillion in new military spending over next 10 years
Biden Chooses Not to Sanction Head of Russia’s Nord Stream 2 Pipeline Project
US Intelligence Walks Back Claim Russia Paid Bounties for US Troops in Afghanistan
US Intelligence Walks Back Claim Russia Paid Bounties for US Troops in Afghanistan
Despite the fact that the Russian bounty story has zero credibility, the Biden administration is still using it to advance hawkish Russia policies. When announcing a series of sanctions on Moscow and the expelling of Russian diplomats on Thursday, the State Department cited “reports of bounties on US soldiers in Afghanistan.”
The Government’s War on Domestic Terrorism Is a Trap
Mitch McConnell Agrees To Pass $2,000 COVID-19 Checks—in a Bill That Would Also Eliminate Section 230
Apparently Trump Refuses To Allow The Government To Do Anything At All Until The Open Internet Is Destroyed
Section 230 protects working Americans more than it protects “big tech.” It protects us posting on social media. It protects us forwarding emails. It protects us when we retweet nonsense. It makes the open internet possible, and enables the next generation of competitors to “big tech” to exist. Lindsey Graham’s weird grandstanding about this is nonsense. Taking away 230 wouldn’t rein in big tech, it would lock in big tech. They have large legal teams and can handle the disruption. This is why Facebook already supports major 230 reform. Zuckerberg knows that it would harm upstart competitors way more than Facebook.
More About Section 230:
Communications Decency Act – Section 230
Is Trump protecting Big Tech from competition or does he really want more censorship?!
You must be logged in to post a comment.