Mikhail Gorbachev: When The Pandemic Is Over, The World Must Come Together
Tag: Nuclear War
With a New Weapon in Donald Trump’s Hands, The Iran Crisis Risks Going Nuclear
In February 2018, the Trump administration concluded its own Nuclear Posture Review.
“We must look reality in the eye and see the world as it is, not as we wish it to be,” Defense Secretary Mattis wrote in the introduction.
The Review formally called for a new low-yield warhead to be deployed on Navy Trident II submarine-launched missiles. Though articulated as a counter to Russia, government and non-government officials today agree that the new W76-2 warhead was all along also intended to fill the niche of providing a usable and prompt weapon to counter imminent North Korean or Iranian attacks, either with WMD or long-range missiles.
— Read on www.newsweek.com/trump-iran-new-nuclear-weapon-increases-risk-crisis-nuclear-1481752
*Theory* The Anglo-Saxon Mission
The Anglo-Saxon Mission
— Read on projectavalon.net/
NATO’s Dirty Little Secret Is Out
It is past time for pro-NATO figures among America’s political and policy elites to come clean with the American people. Americans deserve to know what risks they and their loved ones are incurring because of Washington’s obligations—especially obligations to trivial and vulnerable NATO members on Russia’s border.
— Read on nationalinterest.org/blog/skeptics/nato’s-dirty-little-secret-out-102017
We’re More at Risk of Nuclear War With Russia Than We Think
We’re More at Risk of Nuclear War With Russia Than We Think
— Read on www.politico.com/magazine/amp/story/2019/10/07/were-more-at-risk-of-nuclear-war-with-russia-than-we-think-229436
Rattling the Nuclear Cage: India, Pakistan, Israel, Iran and the US
The Real Costs of Russiagate
Its perpetrators, not Putin or Trump, “attacked American democracy.”
— Read on www.thenation.com/article/the-real-costs-of-russiagate/
Nuclear winter—the long-suppressed reality of nuclear war
An interview with scientist and anti-nuclear activist Steven Starr
By Bryan Dyne, 19 January 2017
For more than three decades, the United States political and media establishment has conducted a coordinated campaign to whitewash the dangers of nuclear war. Using discredited science from the 1980s, US officials have adopted the policy that a nuclear first-strike against Russia could be “successful” and that the environmental dangers posed by multiple atomic or thermonuclear detonations—so-called nuclear winter—have been “disproven.”
Continue reading, here.
Ms. Cat’s Chronicles 