
China’s nuclear submarine launches in past 5 years challenge US Navy dominance
2026 U.S. National Defense Strategy
It follows that, although we are and will remain engaged in Europe, we must—and will—prioritize defending the U.S. Homeland and deterring China.
Related papers from the Marathon Initiative:
Bridge Colby / DTRA – Sharing the Load: Developing Better Strategies for Burden Sharing
Robert Almelor Delfeld / Elbridge Colby: Broadening the Base: A Blueprint for Expanding Defense Industrial Capacity
Russia has claimed it delivered Pantsir-S1 and Buk-M2 air defense systems to Venezuela and is reportedly considering sending its new Oreshnik intermediate-range ballistic missile, raising concerns of a potential standoff with the United States.
Previously:
How the US is preparing a military staging ground near Venezuela + the 160th SOAR(A)
[Armchair Analysis] Clausewitz, Mao, and the Long War in Venezuela
“The image posted by Yermak, a retro-style drawing of Donald Trump grabbing a defeated Vladimir Putin by the feet, about to throw him to the mat WWE-style, reflects the current state of the Western world, as it waits for Donald Trump to destroy Russia. The childishness of the drawing may also be representative of that way of thinking.”
Diplomacy of force (Original: Diplomacia de fuerza)
Read More »Just when I thought Cold War diplomacy couldn’t get weirder, Rick Doblin enters stage left with a proposal straight out of a psychedelic utopia: dose Soviet officials with MDMA to ease nuclear paranoia. Not theoretically. Literally.
Read More »He’s still repeating the lie about Ukraine’s nuclear weapons. They never had operational control of them!
Related:
Graham, Blumenthal hail Trump’s new Russia sanctions plan
The Truth About Ukraine’s Decision to Give Up Its Nukes in the ’90s
FAIR USE STATEMENT:
This video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is being made available within this transformative or derivative work for the purpose of education, commentary and criticism, is being distributed without profit, and is believed to be “fair use” in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107.
Note that: The following analysis is all drawn directly from the excellent work of Brian Berletic and the points outlined here are either quoted directly from his tweet (above) or else my own interpretation of his statements made during the podcast uploaded on Youtube today which is also embedded below.
You must be logged in to post a comment.