Parler, Desperate For Attention, Pretends It Doesn’t Need Section 230
Related:
I find it hilarious that the same crew who insists that Twitter/Facebook are “censoring” them, immediately spins around and insists that it’s totally obvious that Parler must remove “trolls, hate speech and harassment” without recognizing their own hypocrisy.
Related:
Roger Stone-Tied Group Claims Dems Are Framing Them as Republican Party Turncoats
Yes, Parler has the right to censor/moderate, but I find it ironic!
Parler Makes Play for Conservatives Mad at Facebook, Twitter
Ms. Mercer said in a separate post that she and Mr. Matze “started Parler to provide a neutral platform for free speech, as our founders intended.” She said the effort is an answer to what she called the “ever increasing tyranny and hubris of our tech overlords.”
But they do censor:
Parler CEO Says He’ll Ban Users for Posting Bad Words, Dicks, Boobs, or Poop
The Problem With Parler: People Prefer Shitting in Clean Toilets
Like Twitter, we were forced to moderate discussion in order to protect the quality of our operation against the encroaching kudzu, and were met with screams of “FREE SPEECH NAZI CENSORSHIP”, because screaming ridiculous bullshit was always this element’s go-to move.
Like Twitter, we reluctantly began kicking off the worst of them, and, like Parler, alternative operations cropped up to serve as safe havens for those cruelly persecuted by our FREE SPEECH NAZI CENSORSHIP.
Related:
The Far Right Establishes Autonomous Zone Safe Space App Parler
You must be logged in to post a comment.