The journalist, also arrested during Congress rule, has been in jail since October on terror charges, reflecting the increasing cruelty of justice system.
The jailing of NewsClick’s Prabir Purkayastha shows there was never a golden age of justice in India
Previously:
The five eyes media is omitting, lying by omission, that these diplomats were meddling where they shouldn’t have been. Which isn’t a shocker considering the targeting of Turkey that’s been going on for years and years now. The involvement of Soros style philanthropy speaks volumes about the reality of this situation.
The pandemic is not a war. The pandemic is a consequence of war. A war against life. The mechanical mind connected to the money machine of extraction…
Bill Gates’ Global Agenda and How We Can Resist His War on Life
Black Lives Matter: The Perils of Liberal Philanthropy
This carefully research article first published in 2016 shows that Black Lives Matter has been funded by philanthropists and corporate foundations including Soros’ Open Society Initiative and the Ford Foundation which has links to the CIA.
The underlying objective is ultimately to control Black Power.
How can activists take an effective and meaningful stance against neoliberalism and racism when their NGO is funded by the financial establishment.
“Manufactured Dissent”. The philanthropists are “funding dissent” with a view to controlling dissent.
The Rockefellers, Ford et al have funded the “anti-globalization movement” from the very outset of the World Social Forum (WSF).
The WSF is said to have transformed progressive movements, leading to what is described as the emergence of the “Global Left”. Nonsense.
Wall Street foundations support the protest movement against Wall Street? How convenient.
We are dealing with a network of corporate funding of so-called “progressive” organizations. This networking of funding dissent is a powerful instrument.
Real progressive movements have been shattered, largely as a result of the funding of dissent.
A campaign is ongoing across America. Black Lives Matter (which is playing a key role in combating racism and the police state) is funded by the same financial interests which are behind the deadly lockdown: WEF, Gates Foundation, Rockefeller et al.
The closure of the US economy supported by Big Money has been conducive to mass unemployment and despair. A meaningful “mass movement” against racism and social inequality cannot under any circumstances be funded by Big Money foundations.
To put it bluntly: You cannot organize a mass movement against the Empire and then ask the Empire to pay for your travel expenses.
Michel Chossudovsky, June 2, 2020
Related:
Billionaires back Black Lives Matter
In the face of rising popular opposition to war, police violence and social inequality, the decision to advance the racialist program of Black Lives Matter is aimed at dividing the working class and preventing the emergence of an independent and unified working class movement against the capitalist system.
Black Lives Matter cashes in on black capitalism
The central purpose of “Vision 4 Black Lives,” and Black Lives Matter, has nothing to do with securing education, health care or other social rights for any section of the working class. It is to divide the working class, subordinate opposition to the Democratic Party and win more opportunities for privileged sections of the upper middle class.
This article reflects critically on the roots, exigencies, and reach of global health philanthropy, comparing the goals, paradigms, principles, modus operandi, and agenda-setting roles of the Rockefeller and Gates Foundations in their historical contexts. It proposes that the Rockefeller Foundation’s early 20th century initiatives had a greater bearing on international health when the field was wide open—in a world order characterized by forceful European and ascendant U.S. imperialism—than do the Gates Foundation’s current global health efforts amidst neoliberal globalization and fading U.S. hegemony. It concludes that the Gates Foundation’s pervasive influence is nonetheless of grave concern both to democratic global health governance and to scientific independence—and urges scientists to play a role in contesting and identifying alternatives to global health philanthrocapitalism.
The Dangers of Relying on Philanthropists During Pandemics
In April 2018, Gates met with President Donald Trump to urge him to follow past presidents and bolster the U.S. pandemic response infrastructure. In response to Ebola outbreaks in 2014, President Barack Obama launched the Global Health Security Agenda, directing over $1 billion to global disease prevention and response. President George W. Bush before him echoed Gates’ talking points—the importance of detecting outbreaks, stockpiling vaccines, and emergency planning—in announcing $7.1 billion plans on pandemic influenza preparations. Exactly the threat we face today in Covid-19.
Instead of bolstering or even maintaining these initiatives, Trump disbanded the National Security Council Directorate for Global Health Security and Biodefense. Even before meeting with Gates, Trump declined to renew $600 million of funding to the Center for Disease Control to prevent global pandemics, which had been approved under Obama. The Trump administration also pushed out homeland security advisor Tom Bossert, who reportedly called for “comprehensive biodefense strategy against pandemics.”
—
Ms. Cat’s Chronicles 