‘Theft’: Advocates decry US decision to withhold Afghan funds
Related:
Video Source: Spar and Brawl on YouTube
‘Theft’: Advocates decry US decision to withhold Afghan funds
Related:
Video Source: Spar and Brawl on YouTube
The neverending accusations and assumptions that Chinese scientists are lying, without evidence, are rooted in Orientalist tropes of the “dishonest Chinese” based on centuries of Western propaganda, which is why some equate lack of evidence for a lab leak with evidence of a coverup.
by Joshua Cho
…
Reading Dr. Baric’s study, one also discovers that the experiments were conducted in North Carolina, not China, with pseudoviruses that can’t cause pandemics, and that Dr. Shi had only provided the genetic sequence used in Dr. Baric’s experiments, as confirmed by an MIT Technology Review report.
Lab-Leak, Gain-Of-Function, and the Media Myths Swirling Around the Wuhan Institute
Related:
They always put the criminals in charge of their own investigations.
Covid-19 Commission Collapses Under Weight of It’s Own Corruption
Bipartisan House Bills Would Launch COVID Origin Probe, Allow Victims’ Families to Sue Beijing
Can I Sue the US Government For My Brother’s Death?! The answer will most likely be no! 😡
Related:
Rand Paul: Fauci Emails Reveal He Has ‘Moral Culpability’ for Pandemic
Corporate Media’s Leaked Chinese Documents Confirm China Didn’t Hide Covid-19
No, China Didn’t ‘Stall’ Critical Covid Information at Outbreak’s Start
Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance: Largest Funders Are Pentagon, USAID (State Department, CIA)

Beijing, the Five Eyes or Something Else? Who’s to Blame for the COVID Pandemic?
At least he makes the connection between the Lugar Lab, in Georgia, and PNAC, unlike others.
Global Times | May 10, 2021
It is the US that is conducting biological warfare and bioterrorism using genetic engineering technology, rather than China, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said on Monday in response to a media report accusing China of weaponizing COVID-19.
US biolab transparency urged after smearing China over weaponizing COVID-19
Related:
The Rand Paul, A. Fauci Exchange: What Rand Leaves Out
New data leak from the Pentagon biolaboratory in Georgia (archived)
The difference between “progressive” and “liberal” gets to the core of what politics in the real world is actually about, and of whether the nation is being controlled by the public (a democracy), or instead is controlled by the tiny percentage of the population who are enormously wealthy (an aristocracy — a capitalistic dictatorship, or also called “fascism” — so that the public are actually the nation’s subjects, instead of the nation’s citizens). Whereas progressivism is 100% supportive of democracy, liberalism is supportive of control by an elite, but one that supposedly represents the interests of the public. There is a big difference between progressivism and liberalism. Most simply phrased: Aristocrats always control the public by employing the popular mythology so as to motivate the majority to accept their own subordination to the aristocracy; and, whereas liberals support that, progressives don’t. This deception by the aristocracy minimizes the amount of physical coercion that will be needed in order for them to control the public. Progressives reject any mythology, and oppose any aristocracy. Liberals simply do not. Conservatives are the aristocracy. The noblesse oblige conservatives are the liberal aristocrats who say that they serve the public interest, but the other aristocrats say that they have no such obligation, and that their being an aristocrat proves their worthiness. And that is the way things function, in the real world. The ‘news’-media are important in deceiving the public so as to enable the aristocracy to control, and this is the reason why aristocrats buy ‘news’-media even regardless of whether those ‘news’-media are directly profitable: owning the ‘news’-media is providing a major service to the entire aristocracy, and therefore becomes repaid to such an owner in many other ways — all aristocrats want to please that member. It’s gratitude to a fellow-aristocrat, and that check can be cashed in many different ways.
Critics of Biden as being a ‘progressive’ are mistaken. Understanding what ‘progressive’ means isn’t so easy.
On 10th Anniversary of the U.S.-NATO Attack on Libya: Powerful Perpetrators Have Yet To Face Justice
Picking up the mantle of Ghanaian leader Kwame Nkrumah, Qaddafi at the time was promoting a Central African Court, and a Monetary Fund and Bank capable of lessening African dependence on Western financial institutions.
He was planning to re-nationalize significant parts of the oil sector, had spurned a building contract with Bechtel, a San Francisco-based construction giant which builds military bases, and had initiated 50 major economic projects with China.
Further, Qaddafi was beginning efforts to initiate a new currency with Libya’s vast gold and silver holdings that could undercut the French franc and U.S. dollar, and refused to cooperate with the U.S. military’s Africa command (AFRICOM), stating that he preferred it to remain headquartered in Europe.
You must be logged in to post a comment.