The End of GETTR Appears to Be Near as Trump Goes With New Platform
Related:
I find it hilarious that the same crew who insists that Twitter/Facebook are “censoring” them, immediately spins around and insists that it’s totally obvious that Parler must remove “trolls, hate speech and harassment” without recognizing their own hypocrisy.
Related:
Roger Stone-Tied Group Claims Dems Are Framing Them as Republican Party Turncoats
Yes, Parler has the right to censor/moderate, but I find it ironic!
Parler Makes Play for Conservatives Mad at Facebook, Twitter
Ms. Mercer said in a separate post that she and Mr. Matze “started Parler to provide a neutral platform for free speech, as our founders intended.” She said the effort is an answer to what she called the “ever increasing tyranny and hubris of our tech overlords.”
But they do censor:
Parler CEO Says He’ll Ban Users for Posting Bad Words, Dicks, Boobs, or Poop
Their First Try Backfired, but Giuliani and Allies Keep Aiming at Biden
It is unclear if the material featured on the sites linked to Mr. Guo is the same as that provided to The New York Post by Mr. Giuliani, which Mr. Giuliani said came from a laptop turned over to his lawyer by a computer store owner in Delaware.
Cambridge Analytica – a Salesgirl’s Report
Like any other propaganda – euphemistically relabelled public relations, Cambridge Analytica sole goal was to influence people. Like an chthonic cult or a fringe religious sect, Cambridge prayed on the fears of vulnerable within the electorate in order to influence their voting behavior. What Cambridge Analytica did happened without anyone noticing. That’s the acme of effective propaganda. Cambridge Analytica preyed upon their deep-seated underlying fears and concerns. When someone asked the boss of Cambridge Analytica, does that mean that the candidate is just a puppet? Alexander Nix replied Always.
For a detailed analysis of Cambridge Analytica:
You must be logged in to post a comment.