The weird, wild, and scary tale of Miles Guo. (Archived).
A Fugitive Chinese Tycoon Met Steve Bannon. Misinformation Mayhem Ensued.
Related:
Tag: Robert Mercer
Lord of the Roths: How Tech Mogul Peter Thiel Turned a Retirement Account for the Middle Class Into a $5 Billion Tax-Free Piggy Bank
Critics of Biden as being a ‘progressive’ are mistaken. Understanding what ‘progressive’ means isn’t so easy.
The difference between “progressive” and “liberal” gets to the core of what politics in the real world is actually about, and of whether the nation is being controlled by the public (a democracy), or instead is controlled by the tiny percentage of the population who are enormously wealthy (an aristocracy — a capitalistic dictatorship, or also called “fascism” — so that the public are actually the nation’s subjects, instead of the nation’s citizens). Whereas progressivism is 100% supportive of democracy, liberalism is supportive of control by an elite, but one that supposedly represents the interests of the public. There is a big difference between progressivism and liberalism. Most simply phrased: Aristocrats always control the public by employing the popular mythology so as to motivate the majority to accept their own subordination to the aristocracy; and, whereas liberals support that, progressives don’t. This deception by the aristocracy minimizes the amount of physical coercion that will be needed in order for them to control the public. Progressives reject any mythology, and oppose any aristocracy. Liberals simply do not. Conservatives are the aristocracy. The noblesse oblige conservatives are the liberal aristocrats who say that they serve the public interest, but the other aristocrats say that they have no such obligation, and that their being an aristocrat proves their worthiness. And that is the way things function, in the real world. The ‘news’-media are important in deceiving the public so as to enable the aristocracy to control, and this is the reason why aristocrats buy ‘news’-media even regardless of whether those ‘news’-media are directly profitable: owning the ‘news’-media is providing a major service to the entire aristocracy, and therefore becomes repaid to such an owner in many other ways — all aristocrats want to please that member. It’s gratitude to a fellow-aristocrat, and that check can be cashed in many different ways.
Critics of Biden as being a ‘progressive’ are mistaken. Understanding what ‘progressive’ means isn’t so easy.
Parler, Desperate For Attention, Pretends It Doesn’t Need Section 230
Bannon’s Boys: How a Band of Grifters Is Trying to Destroy What Is Left of American Democracy
America’s largest (and arguably most problematic) voting machine vendor is ES&S, not Dominion Voting
Parler Makes Play for Conservatives Mad at Facebook, Twitter
Parler Makes Play for Conservatives Mad at Facebook, Twitter
Ms. Mercer said in a separate post that she and Mr. Matze “started Parler to provide a neutral platform for free speech, as our founders intended.” She said the effort is an answer to what she called the “ever increasing tyranny and hubris of our tech overlords.”
But they do censor:
Parler CEO Says He’ll Ban Users for Posting Bad Words, Dicks, Boobs, or Poop
Their First Try Backfired, but Giuliani and Allies Keep Aiming at Biden
Their First Try Backfired, but Giuliani and Allies Keep Aiming at Biden
It is unclear if the material featured on the sites linked to Mr. Guo is the same as that provided to The New York Post by Mr. Giuliani, which Mr. Giuliani said came from a laptop turned over to his lawyer by a computer store owner in Delaware.
DARK IRONIES – The Financial Times And Cambridge Analytica
DARK IRONIES – The Financial Times And Cambridge Analytica
Though not declared in the FT Alphaville piece, the fact that the Financial Times was a client of Cambridge Analytica had been previously reported by Buzzfeed. But Byline Times can now exclusively reveal more details of this contract with the company founded by Alexander Nix of SCL, Breitbart supremo Steve Bannon and the hedge fund billionaire Robert Mercer.
Related:
Cambridge Analytica probe finds no evidence it misused data to influence Brexit
NEW EVIDENCE Connects Johnson, Gove & Cummings
to Cambridge Analytica
Speaking of Cambridge Analytica: Cambridge Analytica – a Salesgirl’s Report
Cambridge Analytica – a Salesgirl’s Report
Like any other propaganda – euphemistically relabelled public relations, Cambridge Analytica sole goal was to influence people. Like an chthonic cult or a fringe religious sect, Cambridge prayed on the fears of vulnerable within the electorate in order to influence their voting behavior. What Cambridge Analytica did happened without anyone noticing. That’s the acme of effective propaganda. Cambridge Analytica preyed upon their deep-seated underlying fears and concerns. When someone asked the boss of Cambridge Analytica, does that mean that the candidate is just a puppet? Alexander Nix replied Always.
For a detailed analysis of Cambridge Analytica:
Ms. Cat’s Chronicles 
You must be logged in to post a comment.