Judges, fracking and a fly: Six takeaways from the U.S. vice presidential debate

Judges, fracking and a fly: Six takeaways from the U.S. vice presidential debate

A FLY IN THE OINTMENT

A stray housefly sat for several minutes on Pence’s white hair, hanging on as he shook his head and parried with Harris over race and criminal justice — providing comic fodder for late-night hosts and Twitter users alike. Biden’s campaign sold flyswatters to capitalize on the buzz.

Watch on YouTube

Barrett accepts nomination, says judges must be ‘resolute’ in setting aside personal beliefs

Barrett accepts nomination, says judges must be ‘resolute’ in setting aside personal beliefs

“A judge must apply the law as written. Judges are not policymakers and they must be resolute in setting aside any policy views they might hold,” Barrett said.

Related:

Barrett Crushed Gig Workers Weeks Before Likely SCOTUS Nomination

Articles/Books By Barrett

Ruth Bader Ginsburg… If only she had supported equal rights for everyone

Ruth Bader Ginsburg… If only she had supported equal rights for everyone

Ruth Bader Ginsburg commanded immense respect, adulation, and influence. She spoke out against racism and discrimination, and has been called ‘a revolutionary.’

Some have written: ‘Even to the end of her life, she remained committed to our mantra: None are free, until all are free…’ Progressive groups are sending out emails about continuing ‘her legacy’ of ‘fighting for justice…’ New York is planning to erect a statue in her honor…

Imagine the impact she could have had if she’d included Palestinians in her concerns, and spoken out against Israeli violence and apartheid, instead of remaining silent and endorsing Israel – established and maintained through ethnic cleansing…

Ruth Bader Ginsburg clears up her views on abortion, population control, and Roe v. Wade.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg clears up her views on abortion, population control, and Roe v. Wade.

The history lesson is this: There was a feminist women’s rights argument for legal abortion in the 1970s, which the Supreme Court accepted in Roe v. Wade. And there was a separate and distinct argument about preventing population growth by being pro-abortion, made by groups like Zero Population Growth, which the court did not accept, not in Roe and not later. Justice Ginsburg herself has never made a population control argument for abortion. These were two different rationales promoted by two different movements. Justice Ginsburg touched on this today as well. She said that in the 1970s, when the ACLU women’s rights project sought funding from the Rockefeller Foundation—one of the groups worrying about overpopulation—the foundation “was not interested in the women’s rights business.”