By Emily Tamkin
We aren’t respecting religious liberty by pretending otherwise.
Overturning Roe vs Wade blurs church and state
Tag: Supreme Court
What About the “Woke” Right?
According to our conservative friends, being “woke” refers to those who are ridiculously politically correct and who speak out too much on social injustice. It’s commonly used as a pejorative term when referring to those on the left, increasingly paring it with phrases like “woke mob” or as a sledgehammer, using “anti-woke” to proclaim their vehement opposition.
What About the “Woke” Right?
Critics Warn Alito Draft Threatens Much, Much More Than Abortion Rights
[2002] The First Amendment: A Wartime Casualty?
Anomaly Six Demo’d Surveillance Powers by Spying on CIA And NSA
Anomaly Six, a secretive government contractor, claims to monitor the movements of billions of phones around the world and unmask spies with the press of a button.
Anomaly Six Demo’d Surveillance Powers by Spying on CIA And NSA
[2018] The Biggest Secret
By James Risen
My Life as a New York Times Reporter in the Shadow of the War on Terror
The Biggest Secret
Related:
Was Jeffrey Sterling Trial a Gov’t Effort to Divide Investigative Journalists & Whistleblowers?
‘We the People’ Are the New, Permanent Underclass in America
By John W. Whitehead & Nisha Whitehead, April 11, 2022
This is financial tyranny.
The U.S. government—and that includes the current administration—is spending money it doesn’t have on programs it can’t afford, and “we the taxpayers” are the ones who must foot the bill for the government’s fiscal insanity.
‘We the People’ Are the New, Permanent Underclass in America
It’s Wrong For Politicians To Announce Plans To Punish Companies For Speech, No Matter Who Does It
I feel like I keep needing to write this, but once again, no matter who does it and no matter which company they’re targeting, it’s wrong for politicians to promise to punish companies for their speech. For some reason, many people’s position on this point changes based on whether or not they like or dislike the politician, and whether or not they like or dislike the company. But it’s wrong.
It’s wrong when Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee go after Major League Baseball for its speech. It’s wrong when Senator Elizabeth Warren threatens Amazon for its speech. It’s wrong when Senator Marsha Blackburn (and a ton of others) threaten Disney for its speech. It’s wrong when White House officials threaten Facebook for its speech. And it’s wrong when Rep. Ken Buck threatens Apple for its speech.
All of this is grandstanding nonsense, but it’s designed to suppress speech. It’s designed to punish companies for speech that these elected officials dislike. And that’s even if the companies have said something stupid or acted in a way that deserves a regulatory response. By positioning any response as retaliation for speech, these politicians are fundamentally going against the 1st Amendment.
It’s Wrong For Politicians To Announce Plans To Punish Companies For Speech, No Matter Who Does It
The Danger of Washington’s Shallow “Human Rights” Rhetoric
For many generations the US has hidden the true, repugnant purposes of its regime change ops behind the sanctimonious rhetoric of “democracy” and “human rights”.
The Danger of Washington’s Shallow “Human Rights” Rhetoric
Romney’s “Treason” Smear of Tulsi Gabbard is False and Noxious, But Now Typifies U.S. Discourse
The Founders limited “treason” in the Constitution due to grave concerns it would be weaponized to criminalize dissent: exactly how the term is now routinely used.
Romney’s “Treason” Smear of Tulsi Gabbard is False and Noxious, But Now Typifies U.S. Discourse
Ms. Cat’s Chronicles 
You must be logged in to post a comment.