Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University joins the show to discuss the war in Ukraine. First, Scott asks him about his extensive experience telling the truth about American foreign policy on national television. They then take a look back at the important developments that led to this war over Ukraine. They discuss the talks after the fall of the USSR, the Russian interest in the port at Sevastopol, the true beginning of the current war in 2014 and more
4/4/23 Jeffrey Sachs on What Led to War in Ukraine
Tag: Treaties
Israeli far-right think tank Kohelet is ‘shaping US policy’, experts say + coup d’état of the Straussians in Israel
While much attention has been given to Kohelet Policy Forum in Israel, experts say think tank has played major role in crafting US policy on Israel-Palestine.
Israeli far-right think tank Kohelet is ‘shaping US policy’, experts say
Related:
[2002] U.S. Announces Intent Not to Ratify International Criminal Court Treaty
U.S. Announces Intent Not to Ratify International Criminal Court Treaty
On May 6, 2002, the Bush Administration announced that the United States does not intend to become a party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. John Bolton, the Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, sent a letter to Kofi Annan, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, stating that “the United States does not intend to become a party to the treaty,” and that, “[a]ccordingly, the United States has no legal obligations arising from its signature on December 31, 2000.” [1]
…
While the policy merits of the Bush Administration’s announcement are of course open to debate, the announcement appears to be consistent with international law. There is nothing in international law that obligates a signatory to a treaty to become a party to the treaty, [6] and the Rome Statute itself (in Article 125) states that it is “subject to ratification, acceptance or approval by signatory States.” In addition, Article 18 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties provides that, upon signing a treaty, a nation is “obliged to refrain from acts which would defeat the object and purpose” of the treaty “until it shall have made its intention clear not to become a party to the treaty.” The Vienna Convention thus contemplates that nations may announce an intent not to ratify a treaty after signing it.
Related:
International Criminal Court: Letter to UN Secretary General Kofi Annan
Secretary Rumsfeld Statement On The ICC Treaty
American Foreign Policy and the International Criminal Court
President Clinton Statement on Signature of the International Criminal Court Treaty
What is the Rules-Based Order?
In fits of, what might well be termed, masochism, some of us now-and-then tune in to the legacy media. When doing so, one is likely to hear western-aligned politicians rhetorize ad nauseam about the linguistically vogue rules-based order. Now and then, the word “international” is also inserted: the rules-based international order.
What is the Rules-Based Order?
H/T: THE NEW DARK AGE
Transitional period of DPR accession to Russia to last until Jan 1, 2026
Donetsk, Oct 3 — DAN. The integration of the DPR into Russia will unfold through a transitional period of three-plus years, according to the Ruling of the Constitutional Court of Russia, which approves the international agreement on the DPR accession to Russia.
Transitional period of DPR accession to Russia to last until Jan 1, 2026
Elon Musk suggests Ukraine peace plan

Samizdat | October 3, 2022
SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk has proposed a plan to end the conflict in Ukraine. The billionaire suggested that new elections be held in the four regions that recently voted to join Russia, while Ukraine would commit to neutrality and relinquish its claim to Crimea.
Elon Musk suggests Ukraine peace plan
SCO Summit Offers Vision of Hope Amid U.S.-Led Insanity for War
The SCO summit this week offers much welcome hope for a saner, more peaceful world.
SCO Summit Offers Vision of Hope Amid U.S.-Led Insanity for War
The US-A genocidal warmongering nation disguised as a democracy?
“They make their rules to be broken. The United States has broken every rule it has ever made, from its first treaty with France to every treaty with us [native Indian tribes], to their last treaty with Iran. They only hold others to their rules. They make war when they want, where they want; they take what they want. Then they make rules that keep you from taking it back.”
– A dialogue from season 3 finale of Yellowstone, a neo-Western cable TV series starring Kevin Costner
The US-A genocidal warmongering nation disguised as a democracy?
Stephen Kinzer: Neutralism returns — and gets more powerful
Stephen Kinzer: Neutralism returns — and gets more powerful
Many countries recoil from us-versus-them confrontations like the one Biden is now promoting. They prefer to resolve disputes through compromise and to maintain good ties even with countries they fear or dislike. Besides, Biden’s insistence that he is leading a global war against autocracy is hard to take seriously as he kowtows to Saudi Arabia, where dissent is punished by beheading or dismemberment.
A second reason more countries are drifting away from the United States is that to many of them, we seem unreliable. In recent years our foreign policies have zigzagged wildly. Written accords with other countries appear and disappear according to election results. Add our acute domestic problems to this mix, and it’s easy to understand why some countries feel reluctant to hitch their wagon to our
One recent American step has especially spooked several large countries. As soon as war broke out in Ukraine, we and our allies froze billions of dollars that Russia keeps in Western banks. Other countries fear they might suffer the same fate if they one day fall afoul of the United States. To prevent that, they are looking for other places to park their money and imagining banking networks outside of Washington’s control. Saudi Arabia is negotiating with China to price its oil in yuan as well as dollars. Iran’s stock market opened a legal exchange this month for trading the Iranian and Russian currencies.
Russia, Finland Treaty- Arctic Maneuvering
Oh it does exist. It may be updated but it exists.
In 1948 The Finno- Soviet Treaty was signed
The text is here
Considering Finland’s desire to remain outside the conflicting interests of the Great Powers; and Expressing their firm endeavour to collaborate towards the maintenance of international peace and security in accordance with the aims and principles of the United Nations Organization:
Russia, Finland Treaty- Arctic Maneuvering
Previously:
You must be logged in to post a comment.