How Trump’s Legal Challenges of the Election Results Turned into a Tax-Deductible ‘Coup’
“Petitioners do not disclose that their request is part of a coordinated effort launched this week to ‘file federal and state lawsuits challenging the presidential election results in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Nevada, Georgia, and Arizona,’” the Democratic National Committee wrote in response to one such legal blitz by the Thomas More Society, a not-for-profit religious group.
Related:
Barr — No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
In an interview with The Associated Press, Barr said U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but they’ve uncovered no evidence that would change the outcome of the election.
…
Barr didn’t name Powell specifically but said: “There’s been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results. And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that,” Barr said.
The Fixer has spoken! Now stop crying and accept the results!
Trump files suit to overturn his loss in Wisconsin
Notably, Trump’s suit does not allege or provide evidence of widespread electoral fraud, as the president has repeatedly claimed on Twitter and elsewhere. Instead, the campaign is alleging that those roughly 221,000 ballots were cast in violation of state law.
…
When Trump narrowly carried the state in 2016, his campaign did not challenge practices like in-person absentee voting and clerks filling out missing witness information.
The Pledge of Allegiance’s Creepy Past
Related sources:
How the Pledge of Allegiance Went from Marketing Ploy to Classroom Staple
Bob Greene Ignores the Socialist Origins of the Pledge of Allegiance
Trump, Bob Greene, who knows?! /sarcasm
Related news:
Trump demands ‘patriotic education’ in U.S. schools
Ms. Cat’s Chronicles 
You must be logged in to post a comment.