Oversight Report Finds Several Federal Agencies Are Still Using Clearview’s Facial Recognition Tech

from the look,-we-honestly-thought-no-one-would-keep-asking-questions dept
Thu, Sep 28th 2023 10:41am – Tim Cushing

Two years ago, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released its initial review of federal use of facial recognition tech. That report found that at least half of the 20 agencies examined were using Clearview’s controversial facial recognition tech.

Oversight Report Finds Several Federal Agencies Are Still Using Clearview’s Facial Recognition Tech

Armed man impersonating US Marshal arrested at Robert F. Kennedy Jr. event ID’d

@ogbigmr.e717

EMRGENCY BROADCAST!!! Name: Adrian Paul Aispuro / Secret Space Program: Gen 3 ULTRA Enhanced Asset JEDI WARRIOR / Medical Science Officer Specializing in Emergency Health Sciences and Corporate Espionage

♬ original sound – StoicMedic717

A man who claimed to be part of Robert F. Kennedy’s security detail — while carrying pistols and extra ammunition — was quickly detained by authorities after showing up at a California event featuring the Democratic presidential candidate, authorities said.

Armed man impersonating US Marshal arrested at Robert F. Kennedy event ID’d

The Daily Beast. 🙄 He only has one public video, on TikTok, and no videos on Rumble. 🧐

9/11, 22 Years Later: Will We Ever Get the Truth?

On June 6, Tucker Carlson, America’s most-watched TV pundit, launched a new show on Twitter. No longer reined in by Fox News executives, Carlson was free to ask a big, explosive question: “What exactly happened on 9/11?” He answered himself: “Well, it’s still classified.”

9/11, 22 Years Later: Will We Ever Get the Truth?

H/T: Der Friedensstifter

Related:

Tucker Carlson on 9/11 Truth (Building 7)

Tucker Carlson Calls 911 Truthers “Parasites” (Rumble)

The Coming Fight Over American Surveillance

The Coming Fight Over American Surveillance

But no threat of any kind is required to conduct surveillance under Section 702. The law permits surveillance of any foreigner abroad, as long as a significant purpose of the surveillance is to acquire “foreign intelligence information.” FISA defines this term extremely broadly to include any “information related to . . . the conduct of U.S. foreign affairs.” A conversation between friends about whether the United States should do more to support Ukraine would justify surveillance under this definition.

😳